![]() ![]() However, he seemed to have vanished off the face of the earth. Naturally, Charles was the prime suspect in this heinous crime. The couples’ innards had been flushed down the toilet. His eyes had been gouged out and his genitalia removed. The police deduced that Edwina had been brutally beaten and shot, while Fred suffered forceful trauma to the head. The remains were that of Fred and Edwina Rogers. ![]() Additional officers arrived on the stomach-turning scene and slowly removed the packages full of dismembered body parts from the fridge. Then they noticed two human heads in the vegetable bin. They opened the fridge and noticed numerous packages of meat, neatly stacked atop one another. The patrolmen were unable to locate Fred and Edwina, but they noticed food sitting on the dining room table. When a family member hadn’t heard from the Rogers in several days, he called the Houston police for a welfare check on his elderly aunt and uncle. In fact, many neighbors were not even aware that Charles lived at home with his parents, because he left the house each day before dawn and didn’t return until well after nightfall. The family mostly kept to themselves in their quiet neighborhood, especially given Charles’s reclusive and antisocial behavior. In 1965, Fred and Edwina Rogers were living in Houston along with their grown son, Charles. The identity of the Boy in the Box remains unknown to this day. DNA and dental testing have also been attempted, with no success thus far. Facial reconstruction technology has provided mock images of what the boy might have looked like alive, but no one has ever come forward to claim him. Because there was no real incriminating evidence against the foster parents, Bristow’s findings were dismissed as well.Ħ2 years later, the case of the Boy in the Box has gone cold. He also found blankets similar to the one that was wrapped around the boy’s body. Inside, he discovered a bassinet matching the description of the bassinet box the boy was found in. Remington Bristow, an employee at the examiner’s office, followed the psychic’s directions to the foster house. Related: 29 Unsolved Murders That Will Send Shivers Down Your SpineĪnother lead came from a psychic who accurately described a foster home near where the boy had been found, without ever having seen it. Though Martha’s testimony seemed to match the evidence, her substantial history of mental illness made her an unreliable witness. She also claimed that he was bathed before his death, which matched the coroner’s finding of water-pruned fingers. ![]() She claimed that shortly before the boy was beaten to death, he ate baked beans, which corroborated the autopsy. What made the police take interest in Martha’s story was her knowledge of details that had not been released to the public. Under their roof, he was subjected to physical and sexual abuse. One woman, Martha, claimed that her abusive mother bought the boy. Several people came forward with information relating to the case, but the police were not able to verify anyone’s testimony. The boy was found badly beaten and laid to rest inside an old bassinet box. In February 1957, a college student stumbled upon the remains of a young boy in the woods of Philadelphia and reported his gruesome discovery to the police. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |